Mao Tse Tongue's deleted hidden gem

[MommyTrujillo]

I did. Pay attention.



You don't have to. Every person has an asshole and an opinion. Doesn't mean I should value it.

 

[britaniisaurusrex(:]

Maybe now, Mao could revise his original thread with the location and review to make his post acceptable and/ or start his own review board limited to members of his inner circle with himself as moderator with his own rules?

 

[Tay C]

"Donny" I checked your post history and all I could find was a shitload of useless posts in the "add a word" threads. So let's put things in perspective: I review and you don't. Who's more valuable to this board?

Now maybe you and all the morons who attack me when I try to help you, attack me when I don't review in the traditional way but in my own way, who take and don't give and then complain about the info, all you guys can be rounded up and have some hot gay porn star shoot jizz all over your face.

I am speaking for lots of people who get tired of GIVING to this board and having nothing but abuse thrown our way. If I sound like a little school kid, so be it. The result with be no reviews, which will grind this site to a halt and the advertisers will find another venue. With my page views, I should have been sent a cheque, but instead get constant abuse from the mods and the morons alike.

I understand that moderating is a thankless task, but a little discretionary leeway would go a long way to making those of us who provide reviews a lot more "respectful", especially when the moderation appears to be very selective and arbitrary sometimes, with the final say being a banning rather than a simple explanation. We're all the same, Sheik, we operate on fairness. Brute force just makes people really angry.

I would continue to encourage those who would like to share PM's to drop me a note.

 

[Verbal]

Yeah. BTW Mao you were just going to send me a PM

 

[bread]

I guess we should all be thankful.......

Great review BTW. Nameless, faceless, whereabouts unknown.

 

[MichealUllman]

Great pal, should I take notes from your reviewing style?:

http://massageplanet.net.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=238078

 

[Mom of 4]

The funny thing is, if anyone goes back through your history of posts, you havn't posted a review this year!!!! I gave up at december 2008 going through your post history. Who the f*&k are you to talk smack?

I don't review much, but I don't bite the hands that feed me. I wish I knew where his gem is located too, but ah-well too bad so sad. I guess I have to spend my money searching for a gem just like he did.

 

[Raliegh Theodore Sakers]

My reputation remains unsullied

 

[basketball addict]

I caught a live one here! Thrashing, splashing, gnawing about on the line.....the Big Fish.

Throw him back in......before he expires.

 

[Prometheus]

I have reviewed dozens of girls, perhaps hundreds, and these days I find that I get it from both sides--mods and hobbiests--so it's just not worth it anymore.

You would think that long term contributors to this place would be treated differently than newbs, but it's the other way around. This is the only place where this is true, where experience and contributions go unrewarded.

As much as I think that this place is enlightened, it's not. It's a dictatorship filled with mostly demanding and ungrateful serfs who don't understand the game and just want the digits, damn the girl and damn the consequences.

Mods, have some decency to let my post stand unedited.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Cut the nonsense
This is a review board, review and share or do not
If you choose not to then leave it to yourself.
Thanks to the mods

 

[mike m number 4]

There's no need to apologize Mao... just be thankful you have a great memory on some of the comments made.

 

[Pompal 09.]

It doesn't seem like Mao's thread was deleted
merely because Mao didn't share his gem openly.

I think further clarification of the rules regarding
the disclosure of the ID of MPA/MP in a post
(review or non-review) or through PM would be helpful.

 

[David]

Ok Sid lets take a look at your post:

http://www.massageplanet.net.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=219389



Well, if the same rules apply, you did not specify a person, and did not released contact info. Shouldn't this review be pulled?

 

[Massage Therapist dubai]

Believe me, I'm not apologizing. It's the opposite. But thanks.

 

[Jill Kim]

I would have to agree with you Mao. That's why I have stopped writing reviews.

 

[Katie Sunshine]

Guys please give Mao a break. He's been contributing to this board but he didn't get many thanks.. while he got lots of attacks by not sharing fast enough for good reasons. What kind of ridiculous logic is that? Be thankful when getting free lunch and be understanding when the guy's having difficulties when giving out free lunch.. there's no reason to treat him as a bad guy for that.

 

[i aint know]

Nice work...

 

[Pompal 09.]

but seriously mao, you're seniority compared to me but, reviewing a certain lady and withholding her info is what killed your thread, you could say that you'll share it little by little but who really knew? you have shared a lot and why not share this one too? it's either you share or you don't there's no middle ground. that's the name of the game.

 

[Rick Rick]

Good work. That's typical of the double standard here.

Mods, should I expect that thread will also disappear, or are you prepared to accept that some of my criticism has merit? (aka giving "respect").

Here's another one: You edited my Lotuswood thread some months back because it contained references to "extras". This board is LITTERED with explicit references to extras in parlours.

LITTERED.

So we're into selective editing based on arbitary standards. If the rules are the rules, apply them fairly across the board.

Seeing my point yet?